General notions of anatomy, pathophysiology, and surgical techniques of inguinal hernia repair

Authors

  • Elielson Felix Gonçalves Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Adna Cândido Nogueira Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Millena Arruda Pereira Vieira Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Isabella Alves Nunes Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Rayssa da Costa Nóbrega Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Tamires de Alexandria Matias Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Rafaela Maia de Oliveira Moraes Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author
  • Julian de Assis Almeida Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20332194

Keywords:

Inguinal hernia, Hernioplasty, Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP

Abstract

Inguinal hernia is the most common type of abdominal wall hernia and is characterized by the protrusion of intra-abdominal structures through defects located in the inguinal canal region. Its formation has a multifactorial etiology involving weakening of the transversalis fascia, alterations in collagen metabolism, and factors associated with chronic increases in intra-abdominal pressure. The present study aimed to review the main anatomical, pathophysiological, and technical-surgical aspects related to inguinal hernia repair. This narrative literature review was conducted through searches in the PubMed, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and SciELO databases using descriptors related to inguinal hernia, inguinal canal anatomy, hernia pathophysiology, and open and laparoscopic surgical techniques. Scientific articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, international guidelines, and textbooks published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish were included. Direct hernias are mainly associated with weakening of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal, especially the transversalis fascia, whereas indirect hernias are associated with persistence of the processus vaginalis and protrusion of the hernia sac through the deep inguinal ring. Alterations in the ratio between type I and type III collagen and overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases contribute to reduced abdominal wall resistance. Inguinal hernias are mainly classified as indirect, direct, and recurrent, presenting distinct anatomical characteristics and surgical implications. Among repair techniques, the open Lichtenstein hernioplasty is based on the placement of a polypropylene mesh over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal through an anterior approach and remains widely used due to its technical reproducibility, lower cost, and possibility of being performed under local anesthesia. The laparoscopic TAPP and TEP approaches position the mesh in the preperitoneal space to cover the myopectineal orifice, differing mainly in whether the peritoneal cavity is entered. Laparoscopic techniques are associated with lower immediate postoperative pain, earlier functional recovery, and lower incidence of chronic inguinal pain, especially in bilateral and recurrent hernias. However, they also present greater technical complexity, longer operative time during the initial learning curve, and greater dependence on surgeon experience, particularly in TEP. The choice of surgical technique depends on the anatomical characteristics of the hernia, the patient’s clinical condition, the surgical team’s experience, and the availability of institutional resources.

References

ALFIERI, S. et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia, v. 15, n. 3, p. 239–249, 2011. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21365287/. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

AMID, P. K.; SHULMAN, A. G.; LICHTENSTEIN, I. L. Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. European Journal of Surgery, v. 162, n. 6, p. 447–453, 1996. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8817221/. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

ARREGUI, M. E. et al. Laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach: a preliminary report. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy, v. 2, n. 1, p. 53–58, 1992. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1341501/. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

BRACALE, U. et al. A systematic review on the role of matrix metalloproteinases in the pathogenesis of inguinal hernias. Biomolecules, v. 13, n. 7, p. 1123, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13071123. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

CLAUS, C. M. P. et al. Orientações da Sociedade Brasileira de Hérnia para o manejo das hérnias inguinocrurais em adultos. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, v. 46, n. 4, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20192226. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

DUMITRESCU, V. et al. Anatomical peculiarities of dissection in the transabdominal preperitoneal procedure for inguinal hernias. Journal of Medicine and Life, v. 16, n. 6, p. 948–952, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0235. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

GOKSOY, B. et al. The learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of three inexperienced surgeons. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, v. 16, n. 2, p. 336–346, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.100831. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

HERNIASURGE GROUP. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–165, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

IOSSA, A. et al. TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how? Frontiers in Surgery, v. 11, p. 1352196, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

KOPRIVICA, R. et al. Totally extraperitoneal versus transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic techniques for hernia inguinal repair using glue for mesh and peritoneal closure. Medical Research Archives, v. 12, n. 4, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i4.5248. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

LICHTENSTEIN, I. L. et al. The tension-free hernioplasty. American Journal of Surgery, v. 157, n. 2, p. 188–193, 1989. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2916733/. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

LIM, J. W. et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy by moving average. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society, v. 83, n. 2, p. 92–96, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.83.2.92. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

LYU, Y. et al. Comparison of endoscopic surgery and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of inguinal hernias: a network meta-analysis. Medicine, v. 99, n. 6, e19134, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019134. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

MCCORMACK, K. et al. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, n. 1, CD001785, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001785. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

MEDINA VELÁZQUEZ, R.; MARCHENA GÓMEZ, J.; LUQUE GARCÍA, M. J. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain: a narrative review. Cirugía Española, v. 99, n. 2, p. 80–88, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.03.015. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

NIEBUHR, H.; KÖCKERLING, F. Surgical risk factors for recurrence in inguinal hernia repair – a review of the literature. Innovative Surgical Sciences, v. 2, n. 2, p. 53–59, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0013. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

NIKKOLO, C. et al. Ten-year outcomes after open mesh inguinal hernia repair. Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery, v. 4, p. 14384, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2025.14384. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

RAB, M.; EBNER, J.; DELLON, A. L. Anatomical variability of the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerve: implications for the treatment of groin pain. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, v. 108, n. 6, p. 1618–1623, 2001. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200111000-00029. Acesso em: 9 maio 2026.

RIVAS, J. F. et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: how we do it. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery, v. 6, p. 12, 2021. Disponível em: https://ales.amegroups.org/article/view/6470/html. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

STANDRING, S. (ed.). Gray’s Anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 42. ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2021.

TOWNSEND, C. M. et al. Sabiston: tratado de cirurgia. 21. ed. Rio de Janeiro: GEN, 2024.

ZHA, H. et al. Comparison between totally extraperitoneal versus Lichtenstein operation under local or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis. Hernia, v. 29, n. 1, p. 246, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03424-6. Acesso em: 11 maio 2026.

Published

2026-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GONÇALVES, Elielson Felix; NOGUEIRA, Adna Cândido; VIEIRA, Millena Arruda Pereira; NUNES, Isabella Alves; NÓBREGA, Rayssa da Costa; MATIAS, Tamires de Alexandria; MORAES, Rafaela Maia de Oliveira; ALMEIDA, Julian de Assis. General notions of anatomy, pathophysiology, and surgical techniques of inguinal hernia repair. Journal of Social Issues and Health Sciences (JSIHS), [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, 2026. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20332194. Disponível em: https://ojs.thesiseditora.com.br/index.php/jsihs/article/view/608.. Acesso em: 26 may. 2026.