Evaluation of the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in chronic disease management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13378880Keywords:
Telemedicine, Chronic Diseases, Efficacy, Traditional Care, Blood Glucose ControlAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in the management of chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and respiratory diseases, in comparison to traditional care. The research is motivated by the growing need for efficient and accessible solutions to manage these conditions, which strain healthcare systems and impact patients' quality of life. The main objective is to review the existing literature to determine whether telemedicine interventions provide superior control of clinical indicators, such as blood glucose and blood pressure, compared to traditional methods. The adopted methodology was an integrative literature review, covering studies published in the last five years in renowned databases, focusing on clinical outcomes, hospitalization rates, and mortality. The results suggest that telemedicine offers significant advantages in the continuous management of chronic diseases, including better treatment adherence, reduced hospitalizations, and potential mortality reduction. It is concluded that telemedicine is a viable and effective alternative for chronic disease management, with important implications for clinical practice and health policy formulation, especially in resource-limited settings.
References
ALGHAMDI, Saeed Mardy et al. Acceptance, adherence and dropout rates of individuals with COPD approached in telehealth interventions: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, v. 9, n. 4, p. e026794, 2019.
BLOEM, Bastiaan R.; DORSEY, E. Ray; OKUN, Michael S. The coronavirus disease 2019 crisis as catalyst for telemedicine for chronic neurological disorders. JAMA neurology, v. 77, n. 8, p. 927-928, 2020.
FU, Yu et al. Digitally deployed, GP remote consultation video intervention that aims to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ open, v. 13, n. 2, p. e066158, 2023.
GASS, Felix; HALLE, Martin; MUELLER, Stephan. Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: a systematic review. Digital Health, v. 8, p. 20552076221114186, 2022.
KAZAWA, Kana et al. Evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of nurse-led distant and face-to-face interviews programs for promoting behavioral change and disease management in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a triangulation approach. BMC nursing, v. 19, p. 1-12, 2020.
KUBES, Julianne N. et al. Differences in diabetes control in telemedicine vs. in-person only visits in ambulatory care setting. Preventive Medicine Reports, v. 30, p. 102009, 2022.
LEO, Donato Giuseppe et al. Interactive remote patient monitoring devices for managing chronic health conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, v. 24, n. 11, p. e35508, 2022.
POGOSOVA, Nana et al. Telemedicine Intervention to Improve Long-Term Risk Factor Control and Body Composition in Persons with High Cardiovascular Risk: Results from a Randomized Trial: Telehealth strategies may offer an advantage over standard institutional based interventions for improvement of cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients long-term. Global heart, v. 16, n. 1, 2021.
QUINTON, Jacob K. et al. The impact of telemedicine on quality of care for patients with diabetes after March 2020. Journal of general internal medicine, v. 37, n. 5, p. 1198-1203, 2022.
RUSSO, Giuseppina T. et al. Role of telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic in type 2 diabetes outpatients: The AMD annals initiative. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, v. 194, p. 110158, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Social Issues and Health Sciences (JSIHS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
